View Full Version : Ironman
 
 
Wresh
05-05-2008, 08:22 AM
For those that havenot gone to see Ironman yet, make sure you stay all the way through the credits. 
 
Little look ahead at the sequel;).
Redwingsfan
05-05-2008, 08:29 AM
Great movie and Gwyneth looked absolutely amazing.
Wresh
05-05-2008, 08:34 AM
Great movie and Gwyneth looked absolutely amazing.
 
Ya, she did. 
 
I know I said this on the trailer, but Robert Downey Jr. fits PERFECTLY into the role of Tony Stark. I don't think that they could have made a better choice to play him.
renshin
05-05-2008, 08:50 AM
I completely agree that Downing was the perfect fit for Ironman. It was was the best movie yet besides Transformers.
Renshin
gukaistar
05-05-2008, 09:55 AM
Thanks for the heads up Wresh.   Gonna go check this out Tuesday!!
Aindayen
05-05-2008, 09:49 PM
Gah what did I miss during the credits...
The movie was worth the wait.  Go see it if you haven't.
 Ain
Mystrae
05-06-2008, 06:50 AM
Gah what did I miss during the credits...
The movie was worth the wait.  Go see it if you haven't.
 Ain
Little teaser about the next movie..
Asuryan
05-06-2008, 07:56 AM
"Let's try 10% thrust...."
Oh God I laughed so hard.
Aindayen
05-06-2008, 11:24 PM
Little teaser about the next movie..
I guess this is a good excuse to see it again!  
 Ain
gukaistar
05-07-2008, 04:27 AM
Saw this last night (tuesday) and it was fantastic!   It had the perfect amount of hero cheese, hero training, and boss fight time.  I'd see this movie again.     It also has a soundtrack that would be great for the car with a few HP behind the drivers seat.
The teaser at the end is about 30s long, but worth the loooooong wait.
Vinen
05-08-2008, 01:26 PM
Best movie I've seen in years.  Went with friends last week and I'm going on Saturday with my Father who is a huge marvel comics fan.
Lonskils
05-08-2008, 01:38 PM
First movie  completely from Marvel productons from what I hear.
Aindayen
05-12-2008, 01:50 AM
First movie  completely from Marvel productons from what I hear.
Aye
 Ain
Elkwood
05-13-2008, 06:47 AM
The blockbuster worldwide opening of "Iron Man (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2076905)" didn't just create a franchise -- it kept the   dreams of an independent production company alive. While Paramount Pictures   distributed and marketed the movie that may make Robert Downey Jr. (http://movies.msn.com/celebs/celeb.aspx?c=372076) the next Johnny Depp (http://movies.msn.com/celebs/celeb.aspx?c=175944), Marvel Studios completely financed the   reportedly $150 million picture (cough, more, cough). And with its reboot of "The Incredible Hulk (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2080160)" releasing next month under the same   conditions (just swap in Universal Pictures as the distributor), the company   that once sold off the rights to its characters believes it has justified to   Wall Street investors this new strategy was the way to go. In fact, the studio   was so excited about the success of "Iron Man" that, on the Monday after   the blockbuster weekend, it announced release dates for a sequel and a slew of   new projects that were previously only listed as in development. Here's a quick   breakdown on what they have planned:   
"Iron Man 2 (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2235164)"   
Release date: April 30, 2010 
Lowdown:   This franchise has always been planned as a trilogy, and you can expect everyone   to return and for Terrence Howard (http://movies.msn.com/celebs/celeb.aspx?c=324183) (aka War Machine) to get a lot more screen   time.   
"Thor (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2142324)" 
Release date: June 4, 2010   
Lowdown: Think "Lord of the Rings (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=77618)" meets "Beowulf (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=1826723)." The most recent script rightfully set the Norse   god's origins in pagan times (and was a good read to boot). As the comic book   version also lives in modern times, it will be interesting to see how director   Matthew Vaughn (http://movies.msn.com/celebs/celeb.aspx?c=163277) ("Stardust (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2067924)") ties that into the movie. The more   important question is whether Marvel will spend the money Vaughn needs to make   the magical world of Asgard come to life.   
"The First Avenger: Captain   America (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2235160)" 
Release date: May 6,   2011 
Lowdown: This is going to be a tough sell. Cap has   been around since the 1940s, but other studios were always hesitant to develop   the character because there isn't much appetite for a patriotic supersoldier   draped in red, white and blue in the lucrative overseas market. Marvel is going   full steam ahead, but even longtime comic fans wonder if this one can really   succeed.   
"The Avengers (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2235034)" 
Release   date: July 2011 
Lowdown: If you waited for the   final scene at the end of the "Iron Man (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2076905)" credits, you heard Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson (http://movies.msn.com/celebs/celeb.aspx?c=55377)) tease audiences by introducing the   Avengers Initiative to Tony Stark. This beloved superhero team has been around   since the 1960s, and with Marvel controlling the rights to all the original   members (Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Hulk) this may be a dream project come   true. But is Marvel getting cocky thinking two "Avenger" movies can be hits in   one summer?   
"Ant-Man" 
Release date: 2011   
Lowdown: This is tough sell No. 2. Henry Pym is a scientist   who discovers a way to shrink himself to the size of an ant and to communicate   with them in order to fight evil. Pym's character got much more interesting over   time (not to mention bigger when he became Giant-Man), but this has always been   a hokey concept that conjures memories of "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=25620)." Note to Marvel: Just skip Pym's   Ant-Man years and move ahead to his cooler, current identity of Yellowjacket.   
Which of these Marvel movies are you most excited to see? Share your   thoughts on our message boards.
Talas
05-13-2008, 06:51 AM
That move was only on a $150 million budget??  Nice..
Elkwood
05-13-2008, 07:02 AM
Yea i hear numbers of 140 million to 150 for it.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.