Yea Vin, but you are one of those pinko left wing commies that think everything the government does is to undermine your personal liberty! I am totally kidding! But seriously, our two governments are more or less unmatched in personal freedoms on this planet, along with a number of European countries, and Australia too I guess! I just meant it could be a lot fucking worse anyway :).
Quote:
Give me one BENEFIT to yourself, physically, of smoking marijauna? And no, I won't accept "It makes me feel good", because thats just a temporary feeling, something that as you said yourself, you become tolerant too. I'm talking about cold, hard, benefit...something like "It has increased my ability to retain what I read by 20%"...thats just an example.
Uhm, I actually AGREE with you. In terms of recreational use of marijuana, no, there are virtually no benefits to it. It does help some people with creativity, and maybe makes some people less introverted. I consider the feeling I get from it to be a benefit, in the same way a good meal is well, good, or the same way I enjoy a good CD/book/movie/whatever. You say that doesn't count, that's fine then. There isn't very many (non-medicinal) benefits to pot, but that applies to virtually everything most people do for pleasure. The whole point is you like it, it feels good.
You go to movies? What benefit does a standard run of the mill Hollywood movie give you? Probably nothing. Some of the better ones may enlighten you, get you to think about something you never thought of, or in a different light, or make you eager to take up some good just cause. But most of the time it's mindless entertainment. Should movies be illegal just because they don't offer much tangible good? I would think not. Same thing applies to soft drinks (I would use alcohol, but you don't like it either, it seems :D). Most are actually quite unhealthy, especially diet ones (or so I have heard, aspartame is apparently the devil incarnate). The only benefit to them is that they taste good, and might give you a caffeine buzz. Uhoh, sounds like a drug to me! Again, no one in their right mind would argue they should be made illegal.
Quote:
And if something isn't beneficial to you, it stands to reason that it is BAD for you. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow...but in the long run you will be worse off.
I don't think you can reason that if something isn't good for you, that it must be bad for you. Case in point: I recently read some study that apparently stretching before exercising actually seems to do virtually nothing to prevent muscle stiffness, or injury. But they said it isn't bad either. It's a saw off.
However, in regards to pot, yes I do agree with you that it is probably bad for your health. Your are inhaling smoke into your lungs, and putting your mind in a slightly (or very) altered state. Yea, it's probably gonna be bad for you long term, if not short. But again, is this reason enough to make it illegal? In my marathon post, I stated a bunch of things that are legal that are at least as bad for you as pot, if not exponentially worse. And the vast majority of them are legal.
Remember that idiot I mentioned that decided to ride his snowmobile on the lake in the middle of the night and then drowned? They asked the RCMP, and as far as they were concerned, it is a perfectly legal activity (although if it is to be by the book, he has to have a fire extinguisher, oar, life jacket, and whistle like any other water craft, lol). Now, I am not using the argument that because some other really dangerous activity is legal, that pot should be too. What I AM saying however, is that the risks involved with pot are so small, and limited to one's own self, that it hardly justifies the stigma attached to it.
Quote:
I find that the argument that drinking is a GOOD thing because it has been helping people have sex is LUDICROUS. While you may have been joking, I don't think it's a laughing matter... Drinking is probably the leading cause of rape, sexual assault, spousal abuse and more. Those aren't things to laugh about.
I think everyone involved was kidding there :D. And I agree with you, a lot of terrible things happen because of alcohol. Last year's Canada Day, 4K drunken assholes went on a riot on Whyte Ave here, the main party area in the city. Had they all been sober, there would have been no problems. But again, I hardly think the solution is to limit people's access to it. It is not the government's job to enforce morality on people. Although when people cross the line, there should be significant punishment (a friend of mine has been under house arrest for 12 months because he got stupid that night, and his genius sister had a video camera filming him throwing a garbage can through a window, WTG genius).
Look at what happens in countries where the government does try to instill morality in people. Take fundamentalist Islamic countries. To prevent men of ever being tempted of actually being attracted to a woman, they force women to never really show their face (although some are allowed to, but hair is never to be shown, since we all know how sexy hair is), and often are not allowed to leave their house w/o a male family member. Do you want to live in a society like that? Not for me, thanks.
Quote:
And if drinking is legal, and it has an age limit, but yet kids still go around doing it Illegaly because they are too young, an they go around getting themselves killed because of drunk driving, stupid dares or whatever....you could argue that kids will still abuse marijuana before they are of age.
Again, I agree with you. But that doesn't refute the point I made earlier: that by making pot illegal, it is actually easier to get than alcohol or tobacco. This may not be the case everywhere, I went to a junior high and high school full of Vietnamese people (sorry to stereotype, but there was a bunch of cousins and brothers that were all around the same age that were all involved in criminal activity, several of them are now in jail for murder etc), but at the very least, pot is no harder to get than booze for the average teenager. Making it illegal does nothing to cut off the supply.
Quote:
And like, not to be sterotypical or anything but....anyone I've ever met that smokes pot on a regular basis has been a total loser, burn out, basket case, lazy sob...not generally good values that companies look for in the work place.
I strongly disagree with you here. In fact, if you replace "smokes pot on a regular basis" with "black/asian/white people" it becomes a blatantly racist statement, and no one would accept it. I think that the same reaction should apply to that statement. Just because the pot smokers you have met are burn outs, does not mean all are. And how do you know that the hot shot lawyer across the street or the neurosurgeon down the block are not heads when they get home? You would be very suprised.
You can't make a sweeping generalization about a group of people based on your experience with probably under 20 people. Hell, if I were to do the same based on my experiences with English/Black/Native people who have worked for our business in the past 10 years, I would have to say that every last one of them is useless and has no work ethic. But that would be a stupid and close minded thing to do.
Quote:
People need to grow up and start taking responsibility for their actions, hding behind rationalizations about why marijuana is good for you will only do you more damage than it will good to your life, career, or family.
I totally agree with you in regards to people needing to take responsibility! But where did anyone justify something "because I was stoned"? What do pot smokers need to take responsibility before? Pot smokers, if anything, are LESS likely to commit crimes while high. They are docile and generally friendly, unlike drunks. The only reason that cops can claim that pot smoking increases crime is because THEY MADE IT A CRIME. You would never catch me running across a freeway while baked out of my skull, but I used to do it frequently when sauced up enough. Maybe I just missed your point here, but I really don't see what you were trying to say. Pot doesn't ruin people's lives. The people smoking it do.
It kind of goes back to the whole chicken and egg thing. Was the guy a loser before he started smoking pot (and maybe the loser personality is just predisposed to doing drugs?), or did pot turn him into a loser. I go for the first one, personally. I know way too many people that occasionally toke that are successful or will be successful (hey, I am still young yet!) to think that it drags you down in anyway. Of the ten close friends I had in engineering, probably 5 or 6 of them would say sure if you handed them a J on a friday night house party. These are people who are very smart, and very hard working, otherwise they wouldn't be where they are.
And also, if you want people to take responsibility for their actions, how then does taking the decision away from them make them more responsible? That logic doesn't make much sense to me. If you want parents to be responsible for their kids, is your first reaction to make every violent computer game illegal for a kid to buy? I would hope not.
And I haven't even touched on the myriad benefits of medicinal marijuana, because it's something I am not really equipped to comment on. But it seems to me that all the people that have sicknesses begging to be able to use it can't be wrong. Hell, if someone is terminally ill, they should be able to snort heroin off a whore's tit for all I care, let them have their fun before they die :D. that was partially a joke! sssshhh
I want someone to please please give me a valid reason that pot should be illegal. Because I sure can't think of one. And no, "it's bad for you" or "you shouldn't need to escape reality" aren't good reasons :).
Bleh, that reminds me of another stupid argument, the whole escape reality one. I have heard that used mostly by people from a religious background, or people who think that pot is a crutch for people with emotional problems ("why do you want to be someone else?"). I think the best answer for that one is: why do you read books, go to movies, watch TV, or listen to music?