Printable View
rsmj
Men: We think you are unhappy, although you probably will not admit it. As a ruthless authoritarian you are as moral as it suits you and no more. You do not apply the same rules to men as you do to women.
so like, R was a cock
S got all he could take in this situation where M needed to get R and J free.
J wasnt so evil~
Then why did you list J last?
IMO they did not "Forget any preconceived ideas you may about them" when they made their analasys.
First of all if the really expected ppl to not have any pre-concived notions they should have picked tom, dick, harry and jane (hmm... maybe those are bad names now that I think of it).
Second all the analasis seem to me to only make sence if you feel like the traditional robbin hood story was relevent to the question.
Edit: seems to me that zap just listed them backwards. maybe he is not as evil as this quiz makes him out to be.
ha! you know I had typed that out but killed it because I figured everyone would tell me I over analyzed it:) But for all we know Little John and Robin Hood were axe murderers:) So picking either first after reading "Sheriff of Nottingham throws them in jail" is a preconceived notion of them committing noble crimes that the Sheriff was unjustly imprisoning them for.
The writer of the poll had a preconceived notion when he wrote the results for Little John being in first place:) How honest and moral can a guy be for being in jail with no backstory?:)
You're missing the point :D
This is a psych test that is supposed to be about you :p
The way YOU list them is determined by the backstory you give the characters and so says a lot about YOU. ;)
Psych tests are tricky that way. :p
jmsr
I looked at it a lot like Myzt did, he he.
Oh, damnit! This is nwinn, I didn't realize I wasn't signed in as myself!Quote:
You are the slightly romantic realist. You respect truth, and are broadminded and flexible. Whether you are a man or a woman you are probably a happy person. You like people and they can readily make friends with you. You are not very adventurous, but this does not bother you.
Interpretation
We would expect you to be a happy, well-balanced person who likes people and is liked by others. You question whether many conventional views on morality are valid under all circumstances.
Men: Do we detect a sense of chivalry and idealism under the sophistication?
Sheriff is the easy pick for worst in the story...he forgot his duty to the law and his job to get a little nookie, no morals or honesty there.
Robin is a hypocrite and a moron for not appreciating what Marion did for him, and pretending that she's somehow a different person than the girl he loved...fuck him, #2 on the shitlist.
Marion and Little John were a little tough, but I put gave Marion more points because she went the extra mile for what she believed in...she loved Robin and was true to her love. Little John ended second by...well, by default.
So my order was Marion, John, Robin, Sheriff.
Yep, my reasoning almost exactly. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Amadis
Interpretation
We would expect you to be a happy, well-balanced person who likes people and is liked by others. You question whether many conventional views on morality are valid under all circumstances.
Men: Do we detect a sense of chivalry and idealism under the sophistication?
Sheriff is the easy pick for worst in the story...he forgot his duty to the law and his job to get a little nookie, no morals or honesty there.
Robin is a hypocrite and a moron for not appreciating what Marion did for him, and pretending that she's somehow a different person than the girl he loved...fuck him, #2 on the shitlist.
Marion and Little John were a little tough, but I put gave Marion more points because she went the extra mile for what she believed in...she loved Robin and was true to her love. Little John ended second by...well, by default.
So my order was Marion, John, Robin, Sheriff.
It says a lot about you, yes. But the analysis is not how I filled in the gaps, but how and what the makers of the test filled in the gaps they analyzing me based on what they think the gaps should be filled in by (this is not how this type of test should have been analysed but IMO this is what they did). That is why the analysis is total and complete crap, furthermore the analysis only makes sense if you take into account the robbin hood standard storyline and the test asked you to not take into account the story line. Any test that "expects" you not to read and follow the direction is a CRAP test, PERIOD. If they did this test with 4 other random names I don't think the analysis would make as much sense.Quote:
Originally posted by Vinilaa
You're missing the point :D
This is a psych test that is supposed to be about you :p
The way YOU list them is determined by the backstory you give the characters and so says a lot about YOU. ;)
Psych tests are tricky that way. :p
This would be a great test if they only took out "Forget any preconceived ideas you may about them"
"Robin abused her,"
oops, I missed that phrase, going to do it again to see what I would have said in that case.
ok, I went through the analysis of a few of them, and I guess only the ones I read here seem to be kinda story based, once I read the quested a bit better I got a much more accurate analysis:
You too, believe that morality is another word for commonsense and suitability, and not something which is universally valid or a religious truth. Your feeling for security is strong, and you would rate reliability as one of your virtues.
Men: Your estimate of women as the inferior sex suggests that you are a little uncertain of them.
LJ, Serrif, MM, RH
I never said it was a good psych test :p But all the information is there to make a reasonable decision without needing to refer to the standard storyline... although I think many may have done just that. Of course that in itself is revealing. :pQuote:
Originally posted by waright
That is why the analysis is total and complete crap, furthermore the analysis only makes sense if you take into account the robbin hood standard storyline and the test asked you to not take into account the story line. Any test that "expects" you not to read and follow the direction is a CRAP test, PERIOD. If they did this test with 4 other random names I don't think the analysis would make as much sense.
This would be a great test if they only took out "Forget any preconceived ideas you may about them"